Software Productivity Research
SPR
Home About Us Contact Us News & Refereneces
Metrics Counsel Quality Programs Other Sizing Metrics
Metrics Program Function Point Counting Balanced Scorecard
Training & Enablement
Software Metrics & Counsel
Benchmark & Assessment
Dispute Resolution & Avoidance
Project Estimation
Client Services
Products Tools & Resources
Document Catalog
Software Metrics & Metrics Counsel
Balanced Scorecard

Balanced Scorecard

Whether it occurs during negotiations with a client or during formulation of an internal improvement plan, a balanced scorecard is often proposed as a method for measuring and reporting progress. Frequently, organizations use a balanced scorecard as a mechanism for proving performance and claiming a share of rewards. Regardless of the context, it can be a useful tool for many purposes. However, if the metrics reported are not clearly defined and if the specific commitments are not reasonably achievable, then balanced scorecards are of little long-term use and often lead to more problems and disputes than they resolve. SPR can assist both during the formulation of a balanced scorecard and after the implementation of one.

The Chief Causes of Disaffection with a Balanced Scorecard
All too often, metrics and associated scoring systems that organizations agree to at the outset of a relationship quickly diminish in value and significance. There are two chief causes for this disappointing turn of events.

First, when the metrics themselves are only generally defined, or if the components of performance (e.g., deliverables, response time, problem and severity levels, etc.) are not easily measurable, confusion can quickly arise. Sooner or later it becomes apparent that the contents of the balanced scorecard reports do not contain useful or meaningful data. Just as quickly, confidence in the balanced scorecard diminishes and improvement ceases to be an objective, observable fact, becoming instead more a matter of opinion or point of view. This, of course, defeats the entire purpose of the balanced scorecard.

Second, even when metrics are meaningful and well defined, if the targets set are not within the realm of possibility, no one is served. Improvement is held hostage to unreasonable expectations and/or foolishly optimistic promises. Confidence and harmony are almost always the casualties under such circumstances. Client demands escalate, as improvement seems to lag, while IT managers ratchet up their commitments with no certainty whatsoever that they can be met.

SPR Can Help Before and After You Have a Balanced Scorecard
While you are debating the elements going into a balanced scorecard, SPR can draw upon our industry experience and knowledge base of project data to help you better understand what metrics to use and what commitments make sense. If you are already operating under the implicit expectations of a balanced scorecard, SPR can help optimize your position by reviewing and strengthening your metrics data gathering capability. In addition, SPR can advise on how to make the required metrics more than just contract management overhead and turn them into valuable knowledge capital.